Bruka! I ovi ce da nas uce o borbi protiv korupcije i kriminala?! Komedija
Preporuke:
0
0
2
subota, 11 septembar 2010 14:46
ecc
odlicno. bravo
Preporuke:
0
0
3
subota, 11 septembar 2010 17:21
Neofit77
Autor je opet pri kraju počeo o Rusiji, zaboravljajući veze američke administracije sa kosovskom narko-mafijom kojoj su davali vazdušnu podršku.
Preporuke:
0
0
4
subota, 11 septembar 2010 18:02
medveđa jazbina
ha,ha,ha, gde je ovaj džarno!!! Ma nemojte, molim vas, pa nisu oni takvi, ne rade oni to.. oni su naša nikad ostvarena bez-alternativa!!1hahaha
Preporuke:
0
0
5
subota, 11 septembar 2010 18:12
tajni sastojak
velike brige amerikanaca, britanaca i francuza za budućnost nezavisnog Kosova
Preporuke:
0
0
6
subota, 11 septembar 2010 20:35
paja patak
@ Neofit77 : Potpuno ste u pravu. Ali, da je samo to – ni po jada. Ne znam da li je na srpski jezik prevođen jedan veoma poznat autor američkih trilera R.DŽ.Elori (R.J.Ellory). On je u nizu svojih romana do detalja obradio i opisao duboko organske, prirodne povezanosti organa američke administracije sa najvišim nivoima američkog organizovanog kriminala u prometu i distribuciji droga u sopstvenoj državi, ilegalnom uvozu iz zemalja porekla i državnim udarima i Južnoj i Srednjoj Americi, plasiranju kapitala iz tako izvedenih operacija u legalne tokove, političkim ubistvima na svim nivoima u samim SAD. I..... ništa. Kada sve to pročitate, nameće se zaključak da je to tako... pa šta? Izgleda da je prirodno... ne treba se uzbuđivati... ili? Kosovska narko-mafija je samo jedna sitna epizoda na tom globalnom planu.
Preporuke:
0
0
7
nedelja, 12 septembar 2010 02:11
Vladimir Dž
“Kada pljačka postane način života za grupu ljudi koji žive zajedno u društvu, oni stvore sebi tokom vremena legalan sistem koji odobrava to i moralan kod koji ga glorifikuje” ~ Frederic Bastiat, 1801-1850, ekonomski političar.
Preporuke:
0
0
8
petak, 17 septembar 2010 21:00
Petrushin
Bankrupt Europeans are flocking to London
By Anousha Sakoui
The City of London is getting itself a bad name. A “bankruptcy brothel” is what some now call it – a haven for European companies and their owners fleeing creditors, into the welcoming arms of its courts.
In recent weeks, these fears have been further reinforced with companies from Greece and the Netherlands moving their “centres of main interest” to London so that they fall under English law in apparent first steps towards their own debt restructurings.
While this trend of jurisdiction shopping for insolvency is not new, in the wake of the credit crisis, the losses for debt investors when companies shift to England can be searingly painful.
Last year, the owners of Wind Hellas, a Greek mobile phone operator, kept control of the business in exchange for fresh funds in a restructuring that wiped out more than €1bn of its unsecured bonds. It was the UK’s biggest pre-packaged administration. In recent weeks, Hellas has told lenders it is moving other funding vehicles to London, as the Greek debt crisis leads the company for a second time to seek the shelter of England should it require a further restructuring.
The impact of that first round of restructuring left scars among debt funds, some of which are based in London. Indeed, such are fears among debt investors, that even the hint of a restructuring under English law can move a company’s debt prices.
Irish telecoms operator Eircom is a prime example. This year speculation that it was looking to follow Wind Hellas by moving certain companies so that they fell under the jurisdiction of English courts sent some of the company’s bond prices lower. The company later said it had no such plans but these sharp price movements highlight just how skittish debt investors have become.
The question that policymakers and lawmakers are now asking is whether these English insolvency laws are good or bad for the UK economy...
Preporuke:
0
0
9
petak, 17 septembar 2010 21:03
Petrushin (nastavak)
The first is the ability to move certain companies to the UK to benefit from English insolvency laws. The second is the use of the so-called “pre-pack” – a court process that has become controversial during the crisis. It allows a company to be sold quickly by senior ranking lenders to a new owner. Importantly it can be done without the permission, and often with the purpose of leaving behind the claims, of lower ranking creditors such as unsecured bondholders, suppliers or landlords.
Unlike debt investors, many insolvency specialists favour English laws, arguing that pre-packs can prevent a company from going into administration, thereby avoiding destruction of goodwill in businesses and jobs, as customers and employees walk away.
Moreover, recent research by Sandra Frisbee, an associate professor at the University of Nottingham, has found that in many cases creditors get a better recovery in pre-packs than if a business is sold out of administration. Even some debt investors concede that the UK system has certain benefits over Europe’s fragmented and unpredictable insolvency regimes, which are a big turn-off, particularly for US investors used to a well-tested, one-size-fits-all Chapter 11 bankruptcy process.
The Office of Fair Trading, on the other hand, has concerns. It has called for reform of the UK’s insolvency industry to protect the rights of unsecured creditors, including consumers. While credit markets have improved over the past year, the UK government is worried about a £90bn debt refinancing mountain facing UK companies over the next few years. To this end it is reviewing restructuring laws.
Getting it right when things go wrong is vital, not only for companies trying to keep afloat but also for confidence in debt markets.
A review of current English laws should boost confidence in the system. But the main attraction that London offers for companies going bust compared with the rest of Europe is certainty.
.jpg)
By Anousha Sakoui
The City of London is getting itself a bad name. A “bankruptcy brothel” is what some now call it – a haven for European companies and their owners fleeing creditors, into the welcoming arms of its courts.
In recent weeks, these fears have been further reinforced with companies from Greece and the Netherlands moving their “centres of main interest” to London so that they fall under English law in apparent first steps towards their own debt restructurings.
While this trend of jurisdiction shopping for insolvency is not new, in the wake of the credit crisis, the losses for debt investors when companies shift to England can be searingly painful.
Last year, the owners of Wind Hellas, a Greek mobile phone operator, kept control of the business in exchange for fresh funds in a restructuring that wiped out more than €1bn of its unsecured bonds. It was the UK’s biggest pre-packaged administration. In recent weeks, Hellas has told lenders it is moving other funding vehicles to London, as the Greek debt crisis leads the company for a second time to seek the shelter of England should it require a further restructuring.
The impact of that first round of restructuring left scars among debt funds, some of which are based in London. Indeed, such are fears among debt investors, that even the hint of a restructuring under English law can move a company’s debt prices.
Irish telecoms operator Eircom is a prime example. This year speculation that it was looking to follow Wind Hellas by moving certain companies so that they fell under the jurisdiction of English courts sent some of the company’s bond prices lower. The company later said it had no such plans but these sharp price movements highlight just how skittish debt investors have become.
The question that policymakers and lawmakers are now asking is whether these English insolvency laws are good or bad for the UK economy...
Unlike debt investors, many insolvency specialists favour English laws, arguing that pre-packs can prevent a company from going into administration, thereby avoiding destruction of goodwill in businesses and jobs, as customers and employees walk away.
Moreover, recent research by Sandra Frisbee, an associate professor at the University of Nottingham, has found that in many cases creditors get a better recovery in pre-packs than if a business is sold out of administration. Even some debt investors concede that the UK system has certain benefits over Europe’s fragmented and unpredictable insolvency regimes, which are a big turn-off, particularly for US investors used to a well-tested, one-size-fits-all Chapter 11 bankruptcy process.
The Office of Fair Trading, on the other hand, has concerns. It has called for reform of the UK’s insolvency industry to protect the rights of unsecured creditors, including consumers. While credit markets have improved over the past year, the UK government is worried about a £90bn debt refinancing mountain facing UK companies over the next few years. To this end it is reviewing restructuring laws.
Getting it right when things go wrong is vital, not only for companies trying to keep afloat but also for confidence in debt markets.
A review of current English laws should boost confidence in the system. But the main attraction that London offers for companies going bust compared with the rest of Europe is certainty.
FT.COM