Bruka! I ovi ce da nas uce o borbi protiv korupcije i kriminala?! Komedija
Препоруке:
0
0
2
субота, 11 септембар 2010 14:46
ecc
odlicno. bravo
Препоруке:
0
0
3
субота, 11 септембар 2010 17:21
Неофит77
Аутор је опет при крају почео о Русији, заборављајући везе америчке администрације са косовском нарко-мафијом којој су давали ваздушну подршку.
Препоруке:
0
0
4
субота, 11 септембар 2010 18:02
медвеђа јазбина
ха,ха,ха, где је овај џарно!!! Ма немојте, молим вас, па нису они такви, не раде они то.. они су наша никад остварена без-алтернатива!!1хахаха
Препоруке:
0
0
5
субота, 11 септембар 2010 18:12
тајни састојак
велике бриге американаца, британаца и француза за будућност независног Косова
Препоруке:
0
0
6
субота, 11 септембар 2010 20:35
паја патак
@ Неофит77 : Потпуно сте у праву. Али, да је само то – ни по јада. Не знам да ли је на српски језик превођен један веома познат аутор америчких трилера Р.Џ.Елори (R.J.Ellory). Он је у низу својих романа до детаља обрадио и описао дубоко органске, природне повезаности органа америчке администрације са највишим нивоима америчког организованог криминала у промету и дистрибуцији дрога у сопственој држави, илегалном увозу из земаља порекла и државним ударима и Јужној и Средњој Америци, пласирању капитала из тако изведених операција у легалне токове, политичким убиствима на свим нивоима у самим САД. И..... ништа. Када све то прочитате, намеће се закључак да је то тако... па шта? Изгледа да је природно... не треба се узбуђивати... или? Косовска нарко-мафија је само једна ситна епизода на том глобалном плану.
Препоруке:
0
0
7
недеља, 12 септембар 2010 02:11
Vladimir Dž
“Kada pljačka postane način života za grupu ljudi koji žive zajedno u društvu, oni stvore sebi tokom vremena legalan sistem koji odobrava to i moralan kod koji ga glorifikuje” ~ Frederic Bastiat, 1801-1850, ekonomski političar.
Препоруке:
0
0
8
петак, 17 септембар 2010 21:00
Petrushin
Bankrupt Europeans are flocking to London
By Anousha Sakoui
The City of London is getting itself a bad name. A “bankruptcy brothel” is what some now call it – a haven for European companies and their owners fleeing creditors, into the welcoming arms of its courts.
In recent weeks, these fears have been further reinforced with companies from Greece and the Netherlands moving their “centres of main interest” to London so that they fall under English law in apparent first steps towards their own debt restructurings.
While this trend of jurisdiction shopping for insolvency is not new, in the wake of the credit crisis, the losses for debt investors when companies shift to England can be searingly painful.
Last year, the owners of Wind Hellas, a Greek mobile phone operator, kept control of the business in exchange for fresh funds in a restructuring that wiped out more than €1bn of its unsecured bonds. It was the UK’s biggest pre-packaged administration. In recent weeks, Hellas has told lenders it is moving other funding vehicles to London, as the Greek debt crisis leads the company for a second time to seek the shelter of England should it require a further restructuring.
The impact of that first round of restructuring left scars among debt funds, some of which are based in London. Indeed, such are fears among debt investors, that even the hint of a restructuring under English law can move a company’s debt prices.
Irish telecoms operator Eircom is a prime example. This year speculation that it was looking to follow Wind Hellas by moving certain companies so that they fell under the jurisdiction of English courts sent some of the company’s bond prices lower. The company later said it had no such plans but these sharp price movements highlight just how skittish debt investors have become.
The question that policymakers and lawmakers are now asking is whether these English insolvency laws are good or bad for the UK economy...
Препоруке:
0
0
9
петак, 17 септембар 2010 21:03
Petrushin (nastavak)
The first is the ability to move certain companies to the UK to benefit from English insolvency laws. The second is the use of the so-called “pre-pack” – a court process that has become controversial during the crisis. It allows a company to be sold quickly by senior ranking lenders to a new owner. Importantly it can be done without the permission, and often with the purpose of leaving behind the claims, of lower ranking creditors such as unsecured bondholders, suppliers or landlords.
Unlike debt investors, many insolvency specialists favour English laws, arguing that pre-packs can prevent a company from going into administration, thereby avoiding destruction of goodwill in businesses and jobs, as customers and employees walk away.
Moreover, recent research by Sandra Frisbee, an associate professor at the University of Nottingham, has found that in many cases creditors get a better recovery in pre-packs than if a business is sold out of administration. Even some debt investors concede that the UK system has certain benefits over Europe’s fragmented and unpredictable insolvency regimes, which are a big turn-off, particularly for US investors used to a well-tested, one-size-fits-all Chapter 11 bankruptcy process.
The Office of Fair Trading, on the other hand, has concerns. It has called for reform of the UK’s insolvency industry to protect the rights of unsecured creditors, including consumers. While credit markets have improved over the past year, the UK government is worried about a £90bn debt refinancing mountain facing UK companies over the next few years. To this end it is reviewing restructuring laws.
Getting it right when things go wrong is vital, not only for companies trying to keep afloat but also for confidence in debt markets.
A review of current English laws should boost confidence in the system. But the main attraction that London offers for companies going bust compared with the rest of Europe is certainty.
.jpg)
By Anousha Sakoui
The City of London is getting itself a bad name. A “bankruptcy brothel” is what some now call it – a haven for European companies and their owners fleeing creditors, into the welcoming arms of its courts.
In recent weeks, these fears have been further reinforced with companies from Greece and the Netherlands moving their “centres of main interest” to London so that they fall under English law in apparent first steps towards their own debt restructurings.
While this trend of jurisdiction shopping for insolvency is not new, in the wake of the credit crisis, the losses for debt investors when companies shift to England can be searingly painful.
Last year, the owners of Wind Hellas, a Greek mobile phone operator, kept control of the business in exchange for fresh funds in a restructuring that wiped out more than €1bn of its unsecured bonds. It was the UK’s biggest pre-packaged administration. In recent weeks, Hellas has told lenders it is moving other funding vehicles to London, as the Greek debt crisis leads the company for a second time to seek the shelter of England should it require a further restructuring.
The impact of that first round of restructuring left scars among debt funds, some of which are based in London. Indeed, such are fears among debt investors, that even the hint of a restructuring under English law can move a company’s debt prices.
Irish telecoms operator Eircom is a prime example. This year speculation that it was looking to follow Wind Hellas by moving certain companies so that they fell under the jurisdiction of English courts sent some of the company’s bond prices lower. The company later said it had no such plans but these sharp price movements highlight just how skittish debt investors have become.
The question that policymakers and lawmakers are now asking is whether these English insolvency laws are good or bad for the UK economy...
Unlike debt investors, many insolvency specialists favour English laws, arguing that pre-packs can prevent a company from going into administration, thereby avoiding destruction of goodwill in businesses and jobs, as customers and employees walk away.
Moreover, recent research by Sandra Frisbee, an associate professor at the University of Nottingham, has found that in many cases creditors get a better recovery in pre-packs than if a business is sold out of administration. Even some debt investors concede that the UK system has certain benefits over Europe’s fragmented and unpredictable insolvency regimes, which are a big turn-off, particularly for US investors used to a well-tested, one-size-fits-all Chapter 11 bankruptcy process.
The Office of Fair Trading, on the other hand, has concerns. It has called for reform of the UK’s insolvency industry to protect the rights of unsecured creditors, including consumers. While credit markets have improved over the past year, the UK government is worried about a £90bn debt refinancing mountain facing UK companies over the next few years. To this end it is reviewing restructuring laws.
Getting it right when things go wrong is vital, not only for companies trying to keep afloat but also for confidence in debt markets.
A review of current English laws should boost confidence in the system. But the main attraction that London offers for companies going bust compared with the rest of Europe is certainty.
FT.COM