Malo naivan clanak. Zasto bi teret obaveza unutar NATO bio ravnomerno rasporedjen kada je osnovna funkcija ovog saveza legitimacija SAD kao najmocnije svetske sile. Zahvaljujuci tom savezu SAD svoju moc mogu koristiti kako im se cefne, i da zbog toga nikada ne strahuju od osude slobodne i demokratske Evrope, ciju su podrsku ili barem cutanje kupili. SAD u ovom dilu posteno dobijaju ono sto su platile.
No, svejedno, lepo je uopste saznati da teret pomenutih obaveza unutar NATO nije ravnomerno raspodeljen odnosno da izgleda svi misle da dobijaju manje nego sto su platili....Nekako ispunjava optimizmom za buducnost....
Препоруке:
0
0
2
субота, 12 септембар 2009 18:17
Родољуб
BRUXELLES/ZAGREB - Uz izvođenje hrvatske himne »Lijepa naša«, ispred zgrade NATO-a u Bruxellesu, svečano je u utorak podignuta hrvatska zastava, koja će se od sada vijoriti u društvu još dvadesetsedam zastava zemalja članica vojnog saveza. Svečanosti su nazočili glavni tajnik NATO-a Jaap de Hoop Scheffer, hrvatski premijer Ivo Sanader, te albanski premijer Sali Berisha.
Orkestar NATO-vog zapovjedništva za Europu izveo je hrvatsku i albansku himnu, a na platou na samom ulazu u centralnu zgradu vojnog saveza bila je postrojena i počasna postrojba SHAPE-a koju čine pripadnici svih zemalja članica.
Ceremonija je bila vrlo svečana. Po engleskoj abecedi, kako su poredane zastave, hrvatska je izvješena peta, iza kanadske i ispred češke zastave.
Premijer se zauzeo da i ostale zemlje jugoistoka Europe imaju perspektivu za ulazak u euro-atlanske asocijacije, prije svega na osnovu zasluga i kriterija. Kazao je da se veseli danu kada će Skoplje imati svoj dan proslave.
»Želim poslati poruku ohrabrenja našim prijateljima u Bosni i Hercegovini. Oni također imaju pravo na euro-atlantsku budućnost - budućnost u kojoj će se BiH, kao jedinstvena zemlja tri konstitutivna i ravnopravna naroda, prosperirati i razvijati se u miru i stabilnosti«.
Crna Gora može računati na hrvatsku potporu, a Sanader je istaknuo da vrata NATO-a ostaju otvorena i za Srbiju, jer je hrvatska želja da se razvija suradnja.
»Pristupanje Hrvatske i Albanije dokaz je vizije i odvažnosti osnivača saveza i pokazuje da je privlačnost slobode neodoljiva i dokaz da se narodi s obje strane Atlantika ujedinjuju. To je i nagrada za obje države koje mogu uživati u sigurnosti«, kazao je glavni tajnik Jaap de Hoop Scheffer.
Чланак је вероватно настао у суморном светлу наспрам еуфорије новопримљених чланица, којима је НАТО итекако "неизлишан" у обрачуну са комшијама, тј. нама.
Препоруке:
0
0
3
понедељак, 14 септембар 2009 06:11
Srboljub Savic
NATO
What was idea establishing such military, first of all,
organization 1949?
Who were potential threats to “North Atlantic” countries?
There is no evidence that SSSR ever had idea to attack
any country, especially western – yesterday coalition
partners in huge anti-nazi & fascist WWII.
It is clear, that winning invasion of North America –USA
and Canada, is impossible.
Why West Germany, yesterday arch-enemy, had been
so quickly became NATO member, with German officers
in high positions?
Being political, but USA dictating organization, on top
to military defence, it was easy to get “marketing” anti-
Warsaw Pact – “threat” to “west” and even human civi-
lization, at all.
Dismantle of Warsaw Pact and SSSR without change
to reduce NATO, clearly shows its real roll. NATO,
also demonstrate underestimation and embarrassing
attitude of USA toward European countries. Even,
when United Europe was established and firmed, the
idea of European defence (logic and kind of “must”)
had been quickly silenced, as terrible heresy.
Feeling, any how, rising non-satisfaction with roll and
even “reason d’etre” of NATO, USA needed to make
“case/es”.
Knowing weakness of UN and European political
establishments, against its own Treaty, USA, using
NATO (UE & “international community”) “shield”,
bombarded Serbia (worse than Hitler’s Germany).
In the middle of war-“military intervention”, admitting
50th anniversary, some (cosmetic) changes in Treaty
had been made, to mask rude violations, done and
to be made.
Next “cases” – like notorious ”9/11”, or “WMD” had
been made, to “approve” attacks to Iraq (Israelis to
Palestine, ...) and Afghanistan, later.
S. Savic
Part 1
Препоруке:
0
0
4
понедељак, 14 септембар 2009 06:13
Srboljub Savic
Two parts article, in facts, does not mention, false
reasons to establish, keep acting, or numerous vio-
lations, from its own Treaty to much more important
documents and basic principles of NATO.
Article is critic of non-sufficient contribution of NATO
member states to shameful war against Afghanistan.
Author, like USA strategists, having power to move
“NATO” military machine of destruction, do not
understand the difference between “acceptance” of
their propaganda and real will (based on conviction)
to fight for non-acceptable interests of certain USA
business groups.
High percentage of common people out of USA, do
not “swallow”, all that rhetoric. They interpret it as
mere propaganda – false.
S. Savic
Part 2
.jpg)
No, svejedno, lepo je uopste saznati da teret pomenutih obaveza unutar NATO nije ravnomerno raspodeljen odnosno da izgleda svi misle da dobijaju manje nego sto su platili....Nekako ispunjava optimizmom za buducnost....
Orkestar NATO-vog zapovjedništva za Europu izveo je hrvatsku i albansku himnu, a na platou na samom ulazu u centralnu zgradu vojnog saveza bila je postrojena i počasna postrojba SHAPE-a koju čine pripadnici svih zemalja članica.
Ceremonija je bila vrlo svečana. Po engleskoj abecedi, kako su poredane zastave, hrvatska je izvješena peta, iza kanadske i ispred češke zastave.
»Želim poslati poruku ohrabrenja našim prijateljima u Bosni i Hercegovini. Oni također imaju pravo na euro-atlantsku budućnost - budućnost u kojoj će se BiH, kao jedinstvena zemlja tri konstitutivna i ravnopravna naroda, prosperirati i razvijati se u miru i stabilnosti«.
Crna Gora može računati na hrvatsku potporu, a Sanader je istaknuo da vrata NATO-a ostaju otvorena i za Srbiju, jer je hrvatska želja da se razvija suradnja.
Чланак је вероватно настао у суморном светлу наспрам еуфорије новопримљених чланица, којима је НАТО итекако "неизлишан" у обрачуну са комшијама, тј. нама.
What was idea establishing such military, first of all,
organization 1949?
Who were potential threats to “North Atlantic” countries?
There is no evidence that SSSR ever had idea to attack
any country, especially western – yesterday coalition
partners in huge anti-nazi & fascist WWII.
It is clear, that winning invasion of North America –USA
and Canada, is impossible.
Why West Germany, yesterday arch-enemy, had been
so quickly became NATO member, with German officers
in high positions?
Being political, but USA dictating organization, on top
to military defence, it was easy to get “marketing” anti-
Warsaw Pact – “threat” to “west” and even human civi-
lization, at all.
Dismantle of Warsaw Pact and SSSR without change
to reduce NATO, clearly shows its real roll. NATO,
also demonstrate underestimation and embarrassing
attitude of USA toward European countries. Even,
when United Europe was established and firmed, the
idea of European defence (logic and kind of “must”)
had been quickly silenced, as terrible heresy.
Feeling, any how, rising non-satisfaction with roll and
even “reason d’etre” of NATO, USA needed to make
“case/es”.
Knowing weakness of UN and European political
establishments, against its own Treaty, USA, using
NATO (UE & “international community”) “shield”,
bombarded Serbia (worse than Hitler’s Germany).
In the middle of war-“military intervention”, admitting
50th anniversary, some (cosmetic) changes in Treaty
had been made, to mask rude violations, done and
to be made.
Next “cases” – like notorious ”9/11”, or “WMD” had
been made, to “approve” attacks to Iraq (Israelis to
Palestine, ...) and Afghanistan, later.
S. Savic
Part 1
reasons to establish, keep acting, or numerous vio-
lations, from its own Treaty to much more important
documents and basic principles of NATO.
Article is critic of non-sufficient contribution of NATO
member states to shameful war against Afghanistan.
Author, like USA strategists, having power to move
“NATO” military machine of destruction, do not
understand the difference between “acceptance” of
their propaganda and real will (based on conviction)
to fight for non-acceptable interests of certain USA
business groups.
High percentage of common people out of USA, do
not “swallow”, all that rhetoric. They interpret it as
mere propaganda – false.
S. Savic
Part 2